Episode #1250

Are Computers Creative?

« previous episode | next episode »

Friday, December 16, 2011

Harold Cohen exhibition at the San Francisco Museum of Art, mural from AARON images, 1979 Harold Cohen exhibition at the San Francisco Museum of Art, mural from AARON images, 1979 (Courtesy of Harold Cohen)

This week, Kurt Andersen asks: can computers make art? And if so, when?  Will it be any good?  We’ll meet a program named AARON that’s been painting for nearly 40 years, a filmmaker who replaced her editor with an algorithm, and professor who thinks what computers need is more Shakespeare.

The Computer as Artist

Computers have taken over an astonishing array of tasks humans used to do. They fly our planes, give us directions, recommend books, set us up on dates.  But can they tell us a good story? Meet Brutus, a computer programmed to write fiction.  Through a series of mathematical equations, its ...

Bonus Track: “Self-Betrayal,” written by Brutus

Comments [17]

Robopainter

AARON is the world’s first cybernetic artist: an artificially intelligent system that composes its own paintings. Incredibly, the system is the work of one man, Harold Cohen, who had no background in computing when he began the effort. Cohen was a prominent painter; he represented ...

Quiz: Was this art made by a human or a computer?

Comments [32]

DARCI: A Computer With Great Taste

To make art, a computer first needs to understand what art is. A group of computer scientists at Brigham Young University is attempting this by feeding their program images by the thousands and describing those images. Digital Artist Communicating Intent (she goes by DARCI) recognizes ...

Slideshow: DARCI evaluates art

Comments [4]

Eve Sussman's Algorithmic Noir

A new film premiered this year that is truly one of a kind. whiteonwhite:algorithmicnoir was made by Eve Sussman and her collaborators, known as the Rufus Corporation.  They shot most of the footage in Kazakhstan, improvising the script and taking advantage of the Soviet Union’s ...

Video: watch the trailer

Comment

Smart Programs Read Shakespeare

Patrick Winston is Principal Investigator at MIT's Computer Science & Artificial Intelligence Lab. He believes that creating better artificial intelligence is not a matter of more powerful processing: we have to teach computers how to think more like humans. “We are a symbolic species,” he ...

Comment

Lisa Randall: Knocking on Heaven's Door

Harvard physicist Lisa Randall is at the forefront of the search for new theories about how the universe works.  She’s especially interested in dark matter and is involved in work at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN.  And although her work requires complex math and work on the theoretical ...

Comments [1]

Your 420-Character Stories

Last week, Kurt Andersen talked with Lou Beach, an illustrator who turned his Facebook updates into super-short stories, each 420 characters long.  They are collected in the new book 420 Characters. We asked for your 420-character stories and they’ve poured in ...

Enter Studio 360's 420-Character Story Contest

Comments [2]

Comments [1]

Jon from Seattle and Sunnyvale

While I enjoy every show, this was by far the single most enjoyable show I have heard yet. Creativity, thought, rules, breaking rules, and can a human's creative patttern be copied in an algorithm and programmed on a computer. My answer is, sure, but by the time all the rules and all the states those rules produce and the interactions between them (including the ones that kick in because I'm tired now or today and don't care anymore or I just lost my wallet and now I am totally passionate about something) and you put them in a program, you will have just captured how I behaved one day 20 years ago.

It is like weather. I heard a meteorolgoist at the Naval Academy say (presumptuously, I now understand) that in 1980 "they" knew exactly how to predict the weather tomorrow, but by the time the fastest computers completed all the computations, the "perfect" result would be a week too late. Then I heard from my father an interaction he heard between a local TV news company CEO (in St Paul, MN circa 1983) and the head meteorologist: I need $XX millions for a new super-double dopler shift reducing weather radar so we can increase the accuracy of our weather forecasts. CEO response: Why, just look at the weather in Denver today, because that's what we'll have in St. Paul tomorrow.

Rules matter, and even creativity is rule-based, but which rules and what is the rule the "tells" you when to break one of the other rules.

Keep it up!

Dec. 23 2011 12:53 AM
Vote this comment up Vote this comment down Score: 0/0

Leave a Comment

Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.







URL

If you enter anything in this field your comment will be treated as spam
Location
* Denotes a required field