The coming year is a big one for artists whose work was published in 1978. A revision to copyright law allows musicians, authors, or any copyright holders to reclaim their rights after 35 years. For the already-struggling music industry, this could be a lethal blow, or what Kurt Andersen calls the "copyright cliff."
In 1976, Congress passed a new copyright law with a "termination clause" that took effect in 1978. "The legislative intent was to give artists an opportunity to negotiate after the value of the work has been realized," explains entertainment lawyer Lita Rosario, who is filing termination claims for members of Parliament-Funkadelic, including George Clinton.
But copyright holders are bracing for battle, especially in the music industry, where millions or billions of dollars are at stake. Artists like Bruce Springsteen, Styx, Billy Joel, and The Eagles will most likely file paperwork to reclaim rights next year. Rosario, who represents artists, acknowledges that old albums and best-ofs generate far more revenue for the labels than do new releases. "It's not going to mean the end of the record labels,” she says, “but they're going to have to figure something out for sure. It's another factor that's going to go into how this industry is reshaped."
Consumers may not notice the change in rights, but they may start hearing more songs from the late ‘70s popping up in movies, TV, and online. "Recording artists are much more likely to let businesses get access to their music," Rosario says. "The major labels and major publishers are much more restrictive about that."
→ Do you think it's fair that after 35 years, musicians and other artists get their copyrights back from the companies that bought them? Tell us in a comment below.





Comments [2]
After 35 years it only seems fair that the artists should have the opportunity to renegotiate. After all, a lot changes; not least of which is the value of the that 35 year old dollar. Historically, the artists have gotten screwed- good opportunity to have the value of their work adjusted.
Sure, artists should be able to regain control of their copyrights. Revised contracts should be written in such a way that fairness rules the day. From a big perspective, it may help our country's current economic mind-set to play-out on a smaller scale. By seeing justice for victims of exploitation and others accepting what is fair and good for all involved, it'll become clear that there's plenty (of money) for everyone when our collective priorities are fair.
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.