Saved from Obscurity: Vivian Maier's Street Photos

Blog: 03.29.11

Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - 06:00 AM

If you're in Chicago between now and April 3, you have just a few more days to see an extraordinary exhibit up at the Chicago Cultural Center. It's a photo show by an unknown genius who quietly toiled away at her talents, alone, for decades, but who was almost lost to time.

Fortunately a guy name John Maloof made the discovery, but it happened pretty accidentally.

A few years ago Maloof, a real estate agent, was looking for old pics of a Chicago neighborhood. He attended a small auction and decided to buy a box of negatives, sight unseen — it had been cleared from an abandoned storage locker. He paid $400. Inside he discovered hundreds of negatives — and he was astonished by their quality: mostly black and white street photography reminiscent of Robert Frank, Diane Arbus, and Helen Levitt. Smart, funny, subtle: a dapper man asleep in his car; a crying child; a couple's interwined arms against the graphic folds of the woman's striped skirt.  The images spanned from 1950s through the 1970s. Some were taken in Chicago, some in New York City, some on travels around the world.

For months, Maloof searched for information about the creator. He had little to go on other than the photographer's image and name: Vivian Maier.


Vivian Maier, self-portrait (via Vivian Maier - Her Work Discovered)

Maloof began to keep a blog, posting his favorite images out of the thousands.  In time, he learned Maier was a intensely private person with no partners or children. She was born in New York, grew up there and in France, and then settled in Chicago where for decades she worked as a nanny on the city's North Shore. Maloof found former employers, who had even more boxes of negatives, which also he acquired.  But he still couldn't locate the photographer.

Maloof ultimately quit his real estate job and made Vivian Maier's oeuvre his main avocation. He spends all his time scanning negatives and has tens of thousands to go. Bins filled with hundreds of undeveloped rolls line his apartment.

Thanks to Maloof's persistence, and the support of street photographer enthusiasts around the world that he met via flickr, an exhibit of her work went up at the Chicago Cultural Center this January. The show of 80 photos closes this weekend, but there will soon be more places to see Maier's work. The arty press powerHouse will publish a photo book of Maier's work this fall. And Maloof is raising money to make a documentary — his Kickstarter goal was $20,000, and he currently he has over $100,000 pledged.

But, like a modern day O'Henry story, there's a sad twist to all of this: just months before Maloof figured out the photographer's identity, Maier fell on the ice, hit her head, and died in a nursing home. She was in her early eighties. No one had a chance to tell her about this recent discovery of her work.

While we'll never be able to hear from Maier herself, there is an artifact Maloof found amid the film rolls: an audio recording of her voice (you can find it at 8:50 in this video).

 

Slideshow: Photographs by Vivian Maier

Vivian Maier, Canada.

Vivian Maier, Canada.

Vivian Maier, Untitled.

Vivian Maier, August 22, 1956.

Vivian Maier, January 9, 1957 Florida.

Vivian Maier, 1953 Queens, New York.

Vivian Maier, May, 1953 New York City, New York.

Vivian Maier, January 26, 1955 Uptown West, New York.

Vivian Maier, March 18, 1955 New York City, New York.

Vivian Maier, self-portrait, New York City, New York.

Tags:

More in:

Comments [2]

Wade

Lauren raises a great question. Art scholar Artur Danto suggests, to oversimplify, that something becomes an art object when we put it in an art context. In other words, something becomes art when we put it in a museum, rather than the other way around, i.e., we put art in museums. When we put an object in a museum, we change the conversation about it. Compare: that same object, placed in an enthnographic context, becomes "ethnography," because we talk about it "ethnographically." Andy Warhol's Brillo boxes would be very diferent objects if placed in a day care center rather than in an art exhibit; that in fact is a major point in Warhol's art.

Mar. 29 2011 04:48 PM
Lauren

Wow, this is amazing!

I wish you would do a story on what makes great photography. I went to an art exhibit here in Lexington last week and one element was a long photograph of a rally against immigration. It was interesting in a documentary way, but it wasn't visually captivating (to me at least--sometimes I wonder if this is because contemporary street scenes seem too "normal" to me). At the same time, I've been involved in discussions about putting up an exhibit of Chinese photography and one of the committee members rather dismissively calls it "ethnography" (as opposed to "art" is the undertone). What would make Maier's work "ethnography" or "art" or is "street photography" a better term that supersedes both?

I guess perhaps the term "art" doesn't matter so much, but I'm just curious how a photograph becomes an important object itself (as opposed to an "illustration").

Mar. 29 2011 12:46 PM

Leave a Comment

Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.

Supported by

Supported by

Feeds